<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Underscore Marketing: Precision &#38; Perspective &#187; Trademark Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.underscoremarketing.com/tag/trademark-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.underscoremarketing.com</link>
	<description>We are experts in: Digital Branding, Direct Response, Media Planning and Buying, Search Engine Marketing, Social Media and Digital Measurement.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 19:47:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Follow&#8217;s Yahoo! &amp; MSN&#8217;s Lead?!?</title>
		<link>http://www.underscoremarketing.com/2009/05/15/google-follows-yahoo-msns-lead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.underscoremarketing.com/2009/05/15/google-follows-yahoo-msns-lead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 20:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Tuleya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Underscore Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underscoremarketingcom.siteprotect.net/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google announced that they are lifting the trade embargo on the use of trademarked names in search copy by anyone other than the trademark owner. In a statement made on their AdWords Blog yesterday, a clear move to increase revenue, this policy change will potentially have a big impact on specific products or brands bidding [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google announced that they are lifting the trade embargo on the use of trademarked names in search copy by anyone other than the trademark owner. In a statement made on their <a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2009/05/update-to-us-ad-text-trademark-policy.html">AdWords Blog</a> yesterday, a clear move to increase revenue, this policy change will potentially have a big impact on specific products or brands bidding on their own terms. As it currently stands, only the trademark owner (and any trademark owner approved companies) can include their name in search copy. Therefore these terms typically have high click-through-rates, but low CPCs, producing less revenue for Google. As the policy changes, brands will begin seeing more competition on trademark terms, driving up costs and driving down performance.</p>
<p>The guidelines to the policy changes state that the following companies/sites can use trademarks in text if they are:</p>
<p>1. A reseller of trademarked goods or services. Google compares this to flipping through the Sunday circulars and instead of actual products listed it offers &#8220;dicount cola&#8221; or &#8220;snacks on sale&#8221; Now resellers will be able to call out the specific products they are selling.</p>
<p>2. Sale of components, replacement parts or compatible products corresponding to the trademark.</p>
<p>3. Informational sites. Comparison shopping is a fundamental piece of the internet, and now Google will allow these sites to draw in more customers. These sites cannot be competitive nor sell a competitors product.</p>
<p>This move not only deepens Google&#8217;s pockets, but also helps sites that rely on reselling other companies products. While at first that seems like a win-win for the trademark owners who rely on these sites to push product, at what cost to their own campaigns? As more resellers and affiliates start taking advantage of the policy change CPCs will start increasing, minimizing the efficiency of these terms. While you have little control over resellers and informational sites, implementing guidelines for affiliates can ensure that they do not begin hijacking your own performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.underscoremarketing.com/2009/05/15/google-follows-yahoo-msns-lead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

