Skip to content

Navigating the Threat of MFA Websites in Programmatic Advertising

POVRose SumrallFebruary 3, 20254 minute read

Red warning triangles over a laptop in a dark scene

In the ever-evolving landscape of digital advertising, pharmaceutical marketers are increasingly encountering a significant challenge: Made-for-Advertisement (MFA) websites. These sites are designed solely to generate revenue through ad arbitrage, offering little to no genuine value to users. As a result, they pose a substantial threat to the integrity of digital advertising campaigns.

The Impact of MFA Websites

According to the Association of National Advertisers’ (ANA) Programmatic Transparency Study, MFA sites account for 15% of ad dollars and a staggering 21% of impressions

This prevalence not only misleads buyers but also degrades user experience and increases the risk of ad fraud. For pharmaceutical marketers, this means wasted ad spend and potential damage to brand reputation.

Detecting and Combating MFA Sites

One of the biggest challenges with MFA sites is their ability to blend into legitimate ad inventory. They often go undetected until exposed, as was the case with Forbes’ MFA subdomain revealed by Adalytics

Once blocked, these sites can easily rebrand and reappear, complicating efforts to eliminate them from the digital supply chain.

Strategies for Pharmaceutical Marketers

To effectively navigate the threat of MFA websites, pharmaceutical marketers need to adopt a multi-faceted approach:

  1. Eliminate Financial Incentives for MFA Traffic: Demand-side platforms (DSPs) and supply-side platforms (SSPs) must take proactive steps to stop benefiting from MFA traffic. This involves scrutinizing ad inventory and blocking MFA sites at the pre-bid level.
  2. Focus on Meaningful KPIs: Shift the focus from easily manipulated metrics like viewability and low CPMs to metrics that reflect genuine campaign success, such as qualified audience rate, engagement, conversions, and brand lift. This ensures that ad spend is directed towards high-quality, impactful placements.
  3. Enforce Accountability: All parties in the supply chain—DSPs, SSPs, and agencies—should be held responsible for ensuring clean, high-quality inventory. This includes regular audits and transparency in reporting.
  4. Support Quality Journalism and High-Value Content: Prioritize spending on reputable publishers and journalists who deliver high-quality content. This not only supports a healthy digital advertising environment but also ensures that ads are placed in contexts that enhance brand credibility.
  5. Utilize Inclusion Lists: Instead of continually blocking low-quality sites with exclusion lists, focus on using inclusion lists that allow for the selection of trusted, high-quality publishers. This proactive approach helps maintain a clean supply chain and reduces the risk of ad fraud.

Underscore Marketing’s Commitment

At Underscore Marketing, we are deeply committed to combating MFA websites and ensuring a quality-driven, transparent programmatic advertising ecosystem. Our approach includes:

  • A Comprehensive Set of KPIs: We advocate for a holistic approach that integrates traditional programmatic KPIs with high-value metrics, ensuring that our campaigns deliver tangible results aligned with our clients’ business objectives.
  • Proactive Fraud Prevention: Utilizing tools like DoubleVerify (DV) at a pre-bid level, we block sites and apps associated with ad impression fraud, protecting our clients’ investments and maintaining brand safety.
  • Collaborative Partnerships: We work closely with partners like PulsePoint to conduct rigorous inspections of the supply chain, ensuring full transparency and continuous updates to remove MFA websites.
  • Advocating for Diversity and Performance: While inclusion lists are recommended, we recognize the importance of diversity and inclusion. We balance risk and performance by collaborating with partners to monitor and optimize our suppliers, ensuring we work with quality publishers and exclude potential MFA sites.
  • Demanding Accountability: We hold all intermediaries accountable for their supply chains, continuously challenging the status quo to protect our clients’ investments from MFA fraud.

By taking these proactive steps, we are dedicated to ensuring that our clients’ ads are placed only on high-quality, brand-safe inventory that aligns with their brand goals. Together, we can foster a healthier digital ecosystem where every advertising dollar drives real value.

Learn more about our Media Solutions here.

Sources:

https://adalytics.io/blog/ads-observed-on-www3-forbes-subdomain
https://www.ana.net/miccontent/show/id/rr-2023-12-ana-programmatic-media-supply-chain-transparency-study
https://digiday.com/marketing/wtf-are-made-for-advertising-sites-mfas/
https://www.adexchanger.com/data-driven-thinking/a-pragmatic-approach-to-banishing-mfa-from-the-supply-chain/
https://www.adexchanger.com/the-sell-sider/mfa-sites-arent-going-anywhere-until-there-are-incentives-to-end-them/
https://www.adexchanger.com/data-driven-thinking/its-mfa-freedom-day-celebrate-by-fixing-your-supply-chain/